Difference between revisions of "Template:CCSS ELA Literacy W11-12.1 I Can"
From OdleWiki
(Created page with "{{CCSS ELA Literacy W11-12.1}} *I can analyze substantive (influential) topics or texts to determine an argument that causes or has caused a debate in society. (R)") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{CCSS ELA Literacy W11-12.1}} | {{CCSS ELA Literacy W11-12.1}} | ||
*I can analyze substantive (influential) topics or texts to determine an argument that causes or has caused a debate in society. (R) | *I can analyze substantive (influential) topics or texts to determine an argument that causes or has caused a debate in society. (R) | ||
| + | *I can choose a side of the argument; identify precise, knowledgeable claims; and establish the significance of the claim(s). (S) | ||
| + | *I can identify alternate or opposing claims that counter my argument. (K) | ||
| + | *I can organize claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence into a logical sequence. (S) | ||
| + | *I can anticipate my audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases and develop my claims and counterclaims by pointing out the most relevant strengths and limitations of both. (S) | ||
| + | *I can present my argument in a formal style and objective tone. (P) | ||
| + | *I can create cohesion and clarify relationships among claims and counterclaims using transitions as well as varied syntax. (P) | ||
| + | *I can provide a concluding statement/section that supports my argument. (P) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:44, 10 November 2013
CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.11-12.1
Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
- I can analyze substantive (influential) topics or texts to determine an argument that causes or has caused a debate in society. (R)
- I can choose a side of the argument; identify precise, knowledgeable claims; and establish the significance of the claim(s). (S)
- I can identify alternate or opposing claims that counter my argument. (K)
- I can organize claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence into a logical sequence. (S)
- I can anticipate my audience's knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases and develop my claims and counterclaims by pointing out the most relevant strengths and limitations of both. (S)
- I can present my argument in a formal style and objective tone. (P)
- I can create cohesion and clarify relationships among claims and counterclaims using transitions as well as varied syntax. (P)
- I can provide a concluding statement/section that supports my argument. (P)
